Only days after attending the annual Bilderberg conference in Watford, Cameron has pledged to “look again at GM” foods. In other words, the UK and the EU – in line with the wishes of their pro-eugenics masters – are set to relax laws on genetically modified foods, allowing even more of this deadly, poisonous crap to infest the food chain.
Let us not forget that the inner circle of the Bilderberg Group are committed to a policy of population reduction. Readers will versed in this will hardly need reminding that Kissinger penned the now infamous NSSM 200 in 1974, which recommended that population reduction in the Third World should become should become a requisite goal of US foreign policy. Is it just a coincidence that Monsanto, one of the biggest purveyors of GM foods on the planet also developed the defoliant Agent Orange in the Vietnam War?
Alongside the pathogens which are being released through the aerosol programme, the proliferation of GM foods represents a grave threat to the health and physical well-being of humanity.
The ultimate end game of the global elite is chillingly spelled out in the Georgia Guidestones – 1.Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Here is a link to a story which highlights the devastating impact of GM foods on the stomachs of pigs:
NaturalNews) If you have stomach problems or gastrointestinal problems, a new study led by Dr. Judy Carman may help explain why: pigs fed a diet of genetically engineered soy and corn showed a 267% increase in severe stomach inflammation compared to those fed non-GMO diets. In males, the difference was even more pronounced: a 400% increase. (For the record, most autistic children are males, and nearly all of them have severe intestinal inflammation.)
The study was conducted on 168 young pigs on an authentic farm environment and was carried out over a 23-week period by eight researchers across Australia and the USA. The lead researcher, Dr. Judy Carman, is from the Institute of Health and Environmental Research in Kensington Park, Australia. The study has now been published in the Journal of Organic Systems, a peer-reviewed science journal.
The study is the first to show what appears to be a direct connection between the ingestion of GMO animal feed and measurable damage to the stomachs of those animals. Tests also showed abnormally high uterine weights of animals fed the GMO diets, raising further questions about the possibility of GMOs causing reproductive organ damage.
Another interesting story exposing how major supermarkets like Morrison’s are allowing more and more GM foods into the food chain:
UK supermarket betrays its consumers
In a move for the worse, UK supermarket Morrisons has followed Asda’s lead and announced that it will now allow genetically modified (GM) feed within its poultry supply chain. As a result, poultry and poultry products bought by UK shoppers at Morrisons will probably have been fed on feed containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs), especially genetically modified maize and soya. It’s all very well for consumers to avoid eating GM foods, but unfortunately the meat they eat doesn’t have that luxury — although Jeffrey Smith says that animals avoid GM given the choice. Do they innately understand the risks that many of us are concerned about?
Does eating products from animals eating GM feed expose you to potential risks?
The research about risks to animals consuming GM crops just keeps expanding. It’s worth remembering that it may not be the transgene – the piece of DNA that has been transferred from the donor to the unrelated host crop plant – itself that is dangerous. While the vast majority of GM crops sold commercially have just one or two traits inserted – namely resistance to the herbicide glyphosate (RoundUp) or inclusion of a toxin from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) that makes the transgenic crop toxic to non-resistant caterpillar pests – the biotech industry is desperately trying to find novel traits to patent. By 2015, we can expect to see far more successful patents, some of which will be beneficial in themselves, such as optimised oil and starch content, improved nutrient profiles or drought tolerance.
However, just because the included traits are themselves beneficial does not rule out the possibility that animals or humans consuming the plant might experience adverse effects. It is the process of inserting foreign genetic material that appears to be responsible for a large part of the reproductive defects, reduced lifespan, immune suppression, abnormal growth, inflammatory conditions and other adverse events that have been associated with consuming GM crops. This finding was, of course, precisely what caused Dr Arpad Pusztai to become such a target of biotech interests.
Read more here: http://www.anh-europe.org/news/more-hidden-gmos-in-british-food
Finally the link to yesterday’s story in the Telegraph:
The Prime Minister said he wanted to foster a “pro-science culture” in the UK, and this started with a shift in Britain’s attitude towards so-called GM food, dubbed “Frankenstein food” by its critics.
The comments come ahead of a major speech by Environment secretary Owen Paterson on Thursday next week which is set to signal a change in GM policy.
Advocates argue that GM techniques increase crop yields, avoid the need for pesticides, and could be essential in assuring Britain’s future food security.
The Government is reported to be ready to call for European Union restrictions on cultivation of the crops for human consumption to be relaxed.
The Coalition has allowed small-scale cultivation trials for GM food but widespread use is effectively banned