In May 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation published a document entitled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. The document investigates possible scenarios that could have a significant impact upon the development of human society in the near future. Amongst other things, the document described a scenario of a terrorist attack killing 13,000 people at the London Olympics. Readers of this blog will already know that I believe a major false flag attack was planned for the London Olympics, but that the conspirators aborted their plans due to the level of exposure in the alternative media.
I have written before that the New World Order agenda is seriously behind schedule, but remains on course nevertheless. A scenario entitled “Lock Step: A World of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership” describes a nightmare scenario in which the outbreak of a deadly new influenza strain infects nearly 20 percent of the global population. Substitute influenza for Ebola, and you have a pretty grim picture of how the Ebola virus might spread, and more importantly, the impact it could have on ruling hierarchies, and human liberty.
Let us not forget that in 2009, the Austrian journalist, Jane Burgermeister, filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization, the United Nations, and many of the highest ranking government and corporate officials including President of the US Barak Obama, UN System Co-ordinator for Influenza David Nabarro, the Director General of the WHO Margaret Chan, as well as bankers David de Rothschild, David Rockefeller and George Soros. In her charges, Burgermeister alleged that a corporate criminal syndicate within the US government and other governments of the world, under the direction of international bankers, conspired to commit acts of biological terrorism for the purpose of mass genocide by releasing a laboratory engineered flu pandemic virus on the population of the US and other UN countries. Does the Ebola outbreak represent, therefore, the contingency plans of the global elite in their evil pursuit of a depopulation agenda?
I include below the extract from the Rockefeller document entitled “Lock Step“:
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly (again, substitute Ebola for influenza). Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
As David Rockefeller once famously said “all we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order“.