Month: July 2015

7/7: Ten Years On…

Ten years ago today, 52 innocent people lost their lives when three tubes trains and a bus blew up during the busy morning rush hour on London’s transport network. The British public and the wider world were sold a monumental lie as to who was responsible for the attacks. An official Parliamentary Report, commissioned in 2006 and written anonymously, as well as an official government inquiry led by Lady Justice Heather Hallet in 2011, would endorse the cover story that four home grown Muslim suicide bombers, with links to Al Queada, single handedly carried out the worst act of terrorism on British soil since the mainland campaign of the IRA. But nothing, I believe, could have been further from the truth.

Ten years on, it is time that the truth had its day, and that the real culprits were brought to justice. Of course, in the present climate, with the government propaganda mill working overtime to convince us that the threat from ISIS terrorists has never been greater, I run the risk of being labelled an ‘extremist’ or, at the very least, a deranged ‘crackpot’ or ‘conspiracy theorist’. What I am, in truth, is a frustrated libertarian, who has grown sick and tired of watching our government, and the governments of the US and Western Europe, launch assault after assault upon our most cherished civil liberties – as well as waging wars of conquest in the Middle East – all justified on the pretext of ‘fighting terrorism’, when the biggest terrorists continue to walk the corridors of power in Westminster and Washington with relative impunity.

Contrary to popular perception, terrorism rarely stems from political oppression and economic misery. It is not the deranged and desperate ideology of the downtrodden, but instead, it is a weapon of the oligarchy in their war against the general populace. As any good student of history will understand, ruling hierarchies seldom survive long without enemies. The creation of an external or internal menace is requisite to establishing the legitimacy of a governments authority over its people, and a powerful tool, moreover, to obtain acquiescence in that legitimacy. Therefore, the axiom that terrorist attacks in the last decade have been perpetrated by fanatical and oppressed young Muslims, when subject to even a modicum of research, is revealed to be a falsehood of staggering proportions. Yes of course there are fanatical and deranged young Muslims who want to murder and maim for the glory of Allah, just as there are deranged and psychotic mercenaries who want to murder and maim for Her Majesty’s Government. But these rudderless young men are just the foot soldiers – merely the cannon fodder – who have absolutely no idea that the organisations they are working for are being covertly run by British, US and Israeli intelligence.
7/7 was, in truth, a major false flag event that was planned and executed by the British governments national security apparatus, including MI5, MI6, the SAS and the Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR). The US and Israeli intelligence community was also involved, albeit at a lower level. The ‘attack’ was timed to coincide with a training exercise, organised by Peter Power and his crisis management company, Visor Consultants. This ‘training exercise’, involving over 1000 personnel, was organised to simulate a major terrorist attack on London’s Underground network, at precisely the same stations where the attacks unfolded ‘for real’. This is the classic modus operandi of the Oligarchy and their intelligence networks: false flag terror attacks are always carefully synchronised to coincide with a training exercise or a drill, implemented by the government’s intelligence apparatus. The exercise or drill will mimic, very closely, the real operation, with only minor adjustments required to ensure that the exercise ‘goes live’. The four alleged bombers, Mohammed Sidique Khan, Germaine Lindsay, Shehzad Tanweer, and Hasib Hussein were patsies, recruited by Visor Consultants to participate in what they were told was a ‘terror drill’ or a training exercise.

Before the conspiracy sceptic dismisses this as heresy or mere ‘coincidence’, then I would urge him / her to consider the following:

• The odds of Peter Power choosing the same tube stations for his ‘terror drill’ that were bombed during the real event have been calculated at 3/275 x 2/274 x 1/273, or to put it more simply, around one in three million

In the words of Peter Power himself, in an interview with Radio 5 Live only hours after the 7/7 attacks:

…at half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!…we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don’t want to reveal their name but they’re listening and they’ll know it.

Consider also that:

• The official story is predicated on the conceit that the four alleged bombers caught the 07:40 am train from Luton station to Kings Cross. This was announced at a Metropolitan Police conference in the days following the July 7th bombings, and was also widely reported in the media. However, the alleged bombers could not have caught the 07:40 train that morning because it had been cancelled! When scepticism of the official story began to grow in light of these incongruities, the then Home Secretary, Dr John Reid, admitted that the parliamentary report had made a ‘mistake’, and the official narrative was duly amended. Instead, it was claimed that the bombers had caught the 07:24 train, reaching Kings Cross at 08:23. However, this new timeline was not supported by the (contrived) CCTV footage of the four alleged bombers arriving at Luton station, which was timestamped 07:21.


• Survivors of the explosions on the tube testified, at the Hallet inquiry, that they had experienced the sensation of being electrocuted immediately after the blasts. This would suggest some type of exotic EMP weapon, not the volatile homemade TATP explosives the alleged bombers were supposedly carrying in their rucksacks. Remember, initial media reports described a ‘power surge’ on the London Underground network, not bombs.
• Multiple survivors at the Hallet inquiry testified that the trains were ‘lifted off the tracks’ by the explosions. They also described large craters in the floors of the carriages. This would suggest that the blast came from underneath the carriage, not by suicide bombers carrying explosives in backpacks. It should be noted that the carriages were hidden away for over a year and then destroyed.
• Early media reports suggested at least two of the alleged ‘terrorists’ were neutralized outside Canary Wharf. But how was this possible if, as alleged, the terrorists had blown themselves up on the London Underground? This story has long since been airbrushed out of the official narrative but the story can still be found online at:
• It must also be noted that no post mortems were carried out on the victims of the 7/7 bombings. Why??
These are just some of the many controversies and unanswered questions that abound in relation to 7/7/. Yet in the decade since these terrible events occurred, the government has used the pretext of fighting terrorism to launch an all-out assault upon your civil liberties and quality of life. C’mon folks, it’s time we held the government, the intelligence community, special services personnel, and not least of all, Peter Power and Visor Consultants, to account over the events of 7/7. I am not saying Peter Power is guilty, but clearly he has information that could prove vital to any genuine investigation into the events of that day. To this day, Peter Power refuses to divulge the identity of the client for whom Visor Consultants were organising a ‘terror drill’. He is clearly withholding information about one of the most serious crimes perpetrated on British soil in recent decades and must, therefore, be held accountable. The British public must understand that Peter Power may well have aided and abetted the real culprits of the 7/7 bombings. It is time that he was brought in for questioning.


Moreover, given the current political climate, and the efforts of the Cameron regime to convince us that the threat from Islamic ‘terrorists’ has never been greater, the need for a full public inquiry into the 7/7 terror attacks has never been greater. Any public inquiry with even a modicum of integrity could take the official story apart and, by so doing, would help to throw light upon the lies and the crimes of the British establishment.

The Tunisian Beach Shootings: Why we must see the bigger picture!

1287003399217 2A0586D100000578-0-image-a-1_1435392026202

Ok, lets get one thing straight: ISIS, ISIL, IS, whatever name it is going under today, was created by the US / Western Intelligence apparatus for the purpose of toppling the Assad regime, and waging a series of proxy wars with Syria and its neighbours. 18 months ago, no one had even heard of ISIS. Yet It’s dramatic rise in Iraq and Syria, along with an alleged spate of atrocities and highly publicised (not to mention extremely dubious) executions, was somehow allowed to transpire under the very noses of the US and its NATO allies. Surely, if ISIS were a genuine threat, its leadership would have been neutralised long ago by predator drones and stealth bombers?  Whatever gains they may have made on the ground, ISIS are no match for the technological might of the US and NATO.

Cast your mind back to August 2013, long before the term ‘ISIS’ had entered the political vocab, when both Cameron and Obama had been defeated by Parliament and Congress in their efforts to authorise air strikes against Syria. Back then, ISIS were the ‘Anti-Assad’ rebels – with links to Al Qaeda – that were being trained, armed and funded by the US and its intelligence apparatus. (Yes, history repeats itself, because the CIA had created Al Qaeda to wage jihad against the Soviet Union in the 1980s). Fast forward to July 2015, and now the British and US governments are advocating air strikes on Syria in order to ‘destroy’ ISIS once and for all. Problem-reaction-solution.

Of course, the average citizen approaches the reporting of these events without context. In truth, the driving rationale of the Anglo-American elite is to keep the countries of the Middle East and North Africa in a state of perpetual conflict and civil unrest. A prosperous and peaceful Middle East would pose, in the long term, a significant economic threat to the monopoly men and their fraudulent fiat baking system. So, in order to forestall this, the western elites, through their national security and intelligence apparatus, have utilised an age old imperial strategy of divide and rule in order to keep the Arab nations downtrodden and at the mercy of the (ever expanding) one world ruling structure. The bombing of Syria and the removal of Assad is an integral part of this very sorry saga.

If you find this hard to believe – just another silly ‘conspiracy theory’ – then please take the time to read my previous three blogs, especially ‘Who’s your Jihadi’? If, after reading these previous blogs, you are still tempted to refute what I have written, then please take the time to peruse the links below. These are ‘mainstream pieces which work on the presupposition that the US unwittingly unleashed a monster, but they are very revealing, nevertheless.

As tragic and appalling as they were, the Tunisian Beach shootings conform to all the hallmarks of a major psy op / false flag attack. The official story maintains that a lone gunman, Seifeddine Rezgui, was solely responsible for the deaths of 38 innocent people. But now accounts of the shootings are beginning to filter through to the mainstream narrative that suggest the involvement of more than one gunman (oh, surprise, surprise). Check the link below:

Rezgui is a classic mind controlled patsy – a foot soldier – set up by his handlers to make these attacks appear to be the actions of a deranged lone nut – a ‘lone wolf’ – with only tenuous links to ISIS. He is the latest in a long line of mind controlled patsies including Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and Mark Chapman. Of course, the conspiracy sceptic will always deny the reality of government mind control programs, in spite of the wealth of evidence that is now available. A 1977 Freedom of Information Act request, for example, uncovered over 20,000 documents pertaining to the CIA’s MK Ultra mind control program. But the conspiracy sceptic will never apply the same level of discernment to the statements made by official sources. If the government says it’s true, then I guess it must be!! After all, the government never lies to you. Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. Four Muslim suicide bombers blew up three tube trains and a bus when – just by ‘coincidence’ – the intelligence community was running a terror drill that involved precisely the same scenario. Chemtrails are just contrails. And there is absolutely no cover up of a powerful paedophile ring operating out of Westminster.

Phew, good job those ‘conspiracy theorists’ are all crazy. Now, what time does strictly It’s all mind numbing celebrity bollocks get me the fuck out of here start??

The subtext of the Tunisian Beach shootings is unequivocal: anyone and everyone can now be working for ISIS. No one is safe. No one or nowhere is beyond the reach of the ‘terrorists’.  The people that were gunned down by Rezgui – as well as the cold blooded special services operatives that were deployed to assist him –  were just everyday folk who had worked hard all year to enjoy a holiday in the sun. It could have been you and it could have been me. And that is the point. Traumatised, horrified and angry British citizens will now look to the state as their saviour. ‘Something must be done’. We need more surveillance, more powers of search and arrest, more armed police on the street. We must find out what countries these terror cells are operating from and bomb the shit out of them.

Ask yourself the question: who gains from the Tunisian Beach massacre? A bunch of hard line Muslim terrorists who have now just signed the death warrants of innocent Muslims and Arabic peoples when the bombs start to fall on Syria? Or the Anglo-American finance capitalists – as well as greedy defence contractors – who have a hefty stake in destabilising the Arab countries of North Africa and the Middle East?

The question, of course, answers itself.